
AI Hosting Economics Outpace Bitcoin Mining, CoinShares Says

AI Hosting Economics Outpace Bitcoin Mining, CoinShares Says
WEEX View
- The main variable to watch is execution. Higher revenue per megawatt does not automatically translate into faster earnings if miners must fund expensive cooling, networking and facility upgrades before AI capacity can go live.
- Power access is becoming a more strategic asset than mining hardware alone. Companies with energized sites and utility relationships may be better positioned than peers still dependent on pure hash-rate expansion.
- Markets should also watch the gap between announced AI or high-performance computing contracts and realized revenue. Signed deals support the transition narrative, but delivery timelines and infrastructure bottlenecks remain critical.
CoinShares said in a quarterly report that a megawatt allocated to artificial intelligence can generate about $1.5 million in annual revenue, compared with roughly $500,000 for bitcoin mining, underscoring a widening economic gap that is reshaping parts of the mining industry.
The report comes as mining margins remain under pressure. CoinShares said the average cost to produce one bitcoin has risen to $75,500, while bitcoin was trading at $58,400 in the cited comparison. That leaves some operators mining at a loss under current conditions.
The changing economics are already affecting company decisions. Core Scientific canceled an order for mining machines worth $41.9 million, according to the report, while Keel has stopped bitcoin mining. At IREN, AI-related cloud revenue reached $70.5 million and exceeded revenue from mining, pointing to a business mix that is shifting beyond hash-rate generation.
CoinShares also said the global bitcoin hash rate has fallen 27% since October 2025 to 850 EH/s. At the same time, electrical infrastructure is becoming harder to secure. The report cited 225 moratoriums on data centers in the United States, highlighting growing constraints around grid access and data-center development.
Even so, the move from mining to AI infrastructure remains incomplete. CoinShares said companies converting mining sites into AI facilities are commanding higher valuations, but only $1.1 billion in annualized revenue has been realized from $100 billion in announced contracts. Separate industry reporting has also described AI and high-performance computing contracts as offering stronger revenue per megawatt, while requiring far higher upfront capital than traditional mining sites.
Why It Matters
The report points to a structural shift in how crypto mining assets are being valued. If power-connected mining sites can be redeployed into AI or high-performance computing infrastructure, the sector starts to look less like a pure bitcoin production business and more like a digital infrastructure business built around scarce electricity, land and interconnection capacity.
That has broader implications for both crypto and AI. For miners, weaker economics after rising production costs increase the pressure to diversify revenue. For the AI buildout, mining operators may offer one of the faster paths to energized capacity in a market where new power and data-center approvals are increasingly constrained.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
About WEEX View
WEEX View is a crypto analysis and intelligence hub, covering the latest in Web3, AI, and global markets. Get independent research and in-depth insights to stay ahead of market trends and trading opportunities.
Latest articles
MoreReported Electrum Flaw Could Replace Bitcoin Payments During Fee Bumps
A supplied report says Electrum fixed a malicious-server flaw linked to RBF fee bumps that could cause users to sign forged Bitcoin transactions. The supplied evidence does not directly confirm the 4.8.3 release record.
SEC’s 2027 Exam Priorities Bring Tokenization Into Clearing-Agency Focus
The SEC’s reported fiscal 2027 examination priorities place tokenization within clearing-agency and Regulation SCI reviews, signaling closer scrutiny of systems, controls and vendor dependencies rather than a new rule.
South Korea Pursues Stablecoin Oversight on Two Separate Legal Tracks
South Korea is reportedly preparing a foreign-exchange law amendment covering stablecoin payments and cross-border transfers, while consultations on a separate Digital Asset Basic Act governing exchange licensing and issuance rules are said to be nearing completion.
UK FCA CP26/36 Eyes Crypto Apps That Influence Trade Execution
The FCA’s CP26/36 consultation examines when crypto trading apps move into execution-related decision-making that may require UK authorization. Firms can apply from 30 September 2026 to 28 February 2027.



